The Stew Report

A journal to make people cogitate.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Oscar Predictions


Here are my Oscar predictions (along with the people I hope will win the Oscar):


Best Supporting Actress:

Jennifer Hudson "Dream Girls"


Who do I want to win: Abigail Breslin "Little Miss Sunshine"


Best Supporting Actor:

Eddie Murphy "Dream Girls"


Who do I want to win: Djmon Hounsou, "Blood Diamond"


Best Actress:

Helen Mirren "The Queen"


Who do I want to win: Meryl Streep, "The Devil Wears Prada"


Best Actor:

Forrest Whitaker, "The Last King of Scotland


Who do I want to win:

Will Smith "The Pursuit of Happiness"


Best Director:

Martin Scorcese "The Departed"


Who do I want to win: Clint Eastwood "Letters from Iwo Jima" (Scorcese should have won it for The Godfather)


Best Film:

The Departed


Who do I want to win:

"Letters from Iwo Jima"

Sunday, February 11, 2007

An Aristocracy in America


There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents.

Thomas Jefferson


We all know what Thomas Jefferson thought about aristocracy in America. People in America have to think about the fact that we could be ruled by two royal political families.


These families would have the last names of Bush and Clinton. From 1992 to possibly 2012 and beyond this country that fought against ruling families might elect a leader to rule the United States for the next 20 years. Jeb Bush in 2012 or 2016??


The Hillary Clinton campaign has money and poltical networking on her side that makes her tough to beat on the Democratic side. Jeb Bush will have name recognition along with four years to raise money for a campaign in 2012. I wonder what people in Great Britain might be thinking??

WWRD What Would Ronald Reagan Do?


Every weekend one of my highlights of the week is sitting down for breakfast and spending at least 2 hours reading the newspaper on a Sunday morning. This weekend was a little different because I started with the Saturday newspapers.


There was a Saturday front page story in the Wisconsin State Journal criticizing Pentagon officials for undercutting intelligence by insisting there was a close relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Quida. Acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble told the Senate Armed Service committee that the office took "inappropriate actions" in advancing conclusions on the connection between al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein. (Robert Burns, Associated Press 2/10/07)


The White House spokesman Dana Perino said President Bush has revamped the U.S. spy community to try avoid ing a repeat of flawed intelligence affecting policy decisions by creating a director of national intelligence and making other changes.


What makes this story interesting was that as you contiue reading the article there is another story on page 6. The title of the story reads "Gates: Bombs linked to Iran". New Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated that they have serial numbers and other markings on bombs suggest that Iranians are linked to deadly explosives used by Iraqi militants.


President Bush has told people that he admired President Reagan and wanted his administration to be modeled after the late great Ronald Reagan. There are two things that
contradict President Reagan. The first is that Reagan would not deal with the situation by creating a post that expands the government bureaucracy. The second deals with a famous phrase he used during the Cold War.... "trust but verify". The one word "trust" is essential when outlining strategy based upon intelligence.
When we made a pre-emptive strike in Iraq the world was watching us. What trust will others in the world have if we give correct information and no listens to us due to a lack of credibility in our intelligence findings due to false information?
Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr. had trust in Colin Powell. Apparently our current President Bush does not beleive in him because he ran him out of Washington. Do not worry we have a director of national intelligence that will solve all of our problems. Maybe Mr. Gimble will be getting a Presidential Medal of Honor for his work?

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Rules of the Woodpile


This might be a good start to begin a State of the Union speech.



Text of the speech delivered by College Board President Gaston Caperton on November 14, 2005, at the 118th Annual Meeting of the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges in Washington, D.C.

I have always been proud that our country was the foremost voice for enduring good and widespread progress. Today I fear that the United States, if not derailed, is moving in the wrong direction.

Tom Friedman's book, The World Is Flat, Senator Robert Byrd's book, Losing America, and former Secretary of Commerce Pete Peterson's book, Running on Empty, substantiate this concern.

Let me use a simple down-home explanation as to why I am worried.

In the early days, West Virginians lived in small communities where families shared a common woodpile. There were two rules: The first rule was when you took wood from the common pile, you were obligated to replace it with more. The second rule was never play with fire near the woodpile.

Economic facts tell us that we are clearly violating the first woodpile rule. Let me quote Herb Allison, CEO of TIAA-CREF, from a September speech. He said:

Consider this—if you add the $450 billion shortfall in corporate pensions to the projected $4-10 trillion deficit for Social Security, and throw in another $8-10 trillion shortfall in Medicare and Medicaid obligation, you're talking about $12-20 trillion of unfunded obligations in the United States for retirement and health care.

Add in another $1 trillion shortfall for state and municipal pension plans. Then we have our annual fiscal budget deficit. In July, well before Katrina, it was $333 billion. Our trade deficit is expected to be nearly $700 billion this year. Right now, we're borrowing $2 billion a day to fund our spending habits.

The current federal budget deficit, the current account deficit, and the saving deficit say that we Americans are taking more wood from the pile than we are replacing. We are also violating the second rule as we expose the woodpile to the fire of intolerant religion, coupled with a contentious political climate, a disregard for world poverty, and an expensive war.

These diversions are occurring in a highly competitive globalized economy, where America must be at its best. Let me be more specific: I am the grandson of a missionary. Religion was and is the center of my family's value system. What I have been recently hearing in the name of religion is like hearing beautiful music played off-key.

Jim Wallis, the author of the best-selling book God's Politics, writes:

Abraham Lincoln had it right when he said: "Our task should not be to invoke religion and the name of God by claiming God's blessing and endorsement for all our national policies and practices—saying, in effect, that God is on our side. Rather," Lincoln said, "we should pray and worry earnestly whether we are on God's side."

He explains:

There are the two ways that religion has been brought into public life in American history. The first way—God on our side—leads inevitably to self-righteousness, bad theology and, often, dangerous foreign policy.

The second way—asking if we are on God's side—leads to much healthier things, namely, repentance, humility, reflection, and even accountability.
I personally have learned to be wary that "God talk" is a "noisy gong and a clanging cymbal" when denunciation replaces forgiveness, fear replaces hope, hate replaces love, and war replaces peace.

Religion against religion. Conservative against liberal. Red against blue. Rich against poor. Worker against employer. All of this kills our spirit, dampens our energy, diminishes our hope, and stops our progress. Contentious politics combined with intolerant religion is a formula for disaster.

We protect the wood on the woodpile when our common interests are in America's best interest. We fan the flames with negative campaigns, and we protect the woodpile with intelligent and thoughtful discussion and civil debate.

Dr. Amy Gutmann, president of the University of Pennsylvania, gave a commencement speech at Wesleyan University in May. She said:

You cannot have a reasoned discussion about abortion when one side is slandered as "baby killers" and the other side is smeared as "religious wing nuts." It is hard to pursue a reasoned debate about the Iraqi War when opponents of the war are accused of treason and the President of the United States is compared to Hitler.
Dr. Gutmann ended her talk with these words:

What a waste of the privilege of living in a free society. We need massive doses of deliberation and mutual respect if we are going to move our society and world to a better place.

The United States, long an international beacon of hope for millions, must give new meaning to the word receptivity in terms of dealing with the glaring problems of the poor. The world is watching and wondering whether America, the world's leading economic power, still has the will and the commitment to play its leadership role in substantially reducing world poverty.

The United States is today mired in a war that is consuming our human and material resources, with no real end in sight. I am reminded of the words of President Eisenhower when he said:

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.

Regardless of political persuasion, one needs to acknowledge that we have lost precious lives and expended billions of dollars. The war, if left unchecked, clearly threatens our humanity and destroys our creative edge in the global race for social and economic leadership. Other nations, like China and India, are not stalled by a war.

What America must do is to courageously reassess our priorities. In an article in the New York Times, Thomas Friedman asked the question: "What if we were really having a national discussion about what is most important to the country today and on the minds of most parents?" He writes:

I have no doubt that it would be a loud, noisy dinner-table conversation about why so many U.S. manufacturers are moving abroad—not just to find lower wages, but to find smarter workers, a better infrastructure, and cheaper health care.

The conversation would be about why U.S. twelfth-graders recently performed below the international average for 21 countries in math and science.

All of us understand that education is the key to our nation's future. It is time to restate, in unequivocal terms: what has made the United States unique and strong is our education system. America must strengthen our education to continue our world leadership in this ever-expanding world of global competitiveness. That focus demands more resources and commitment to education excellence and equity.

America must courageously reassess its priorities, announcing, once and for all, that future international leadership is tied directly to educational fitness and quality.

America must not starve its system of education. It must have the will, energy, and courage to nurture it; making sweeping reforms where necessary and providing the resources needed to assure academic depth and strength. American education cannot climb the formidable mountain before it without the needed tools, the increased assets.

International progress will be neither cheap nor easy. What America needs are education leaders who are willing to ask the tough questions, to think through what it will take for the United States to retain its presence as a global leader in education, and to take action.

Going along and getting along is not enough. It will demand an objective review of how much we spend on areas such as defense and health care, and how we bring the federal debt under control.

Those who make the most noise about nonsubstantive political issues cannot distract us. Things must change; the clock is ticking. Education must better serve the people of our nation.

America has the wherewithal to march forward with legitimate hope if its leaders will acknowledge the realities of the day. And that will demand courage, compassion, and determination.

America has the force to lift the downtrodden while remembering that the fortunes of business and industry are key to developing the jobs and the resources necessary to do this. One can remember a time when industrial giants like AT&T were dominant, even monopolies; let us today make sure that American prowess as an international force for good is never a tarnished relic.

Educational leaders must speak with a united voice as never before. We have enormous political clout. We must use it in a way to help guarantee an enduring America, the nation that we revere. We cannot be complacent.

We must not play with fire around the woodpile and must always put more wood on the pile than we take!

In these times, there is too much at stake to let apathy replace diligence and carelessness replace responsibility. We must dare to dream and be risk takers.

As educators, America needs our collective best efforts as never before.

Barack Obama, Dirty Laundry, and a Glimmer of Hope


Some will see this title and think that I am going to tell something negative about Barack Obama. Don Henley's Dirty Laundry made me think about Barack Obama chances of winning the Presidency in 2008.

Dirty Laundry by Don Henley

I make my living off the evening news
Just give me something, something I can use
People love it when you lose, they love dirty laundry

Well, I could've been an actor, but I wound up here
I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry

Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em all around

We got the bubbleheaded bleach-blonde, comes on at 5
She can tell you about the plane crash with a gleam in her eye
It's interesting when people die, give us dirty laundry

You don't really need to find out what's going on
You don't really want to know just how far it's gone
Just leave well enough alone, keep your dirty laundry

Dirty little secrets, dirty little lies
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody's pie
Love to cut you down to size, we love dirty laundry

We can do the innuendo, we can dance and sing
When it's said and done, we haven't told you a thing
We all know that crap is king, give us dirty laundry

I really do not know much about Obama from a political perspective other than the fact that he is a Democrat from Illinois who defeated Alan Keyes in the 2004 Senate race. The only other thing that I know about him is that he voted against the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court. He is also made the list of front runners vying for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States in 2008.

It is my hope that Obama does not get hit by the same fate as other Republican and Democratic front runners. My fear is that the media is propping Obama up for ratings and than tearing down his character and integrity in front of the nation before the campaign season starts. Lets face it Hillary is a seasoned politican with money and has been organizing this campaign for years!!

My hope is that all of the candidates running for office will get their opportunity to state their case to the American people where ideas, substanative arguments, will replace the 7 second sound bite or the 30 second commercial paid for by people who have more influence on an election than a voter. Will media pundits be watching who gets the money from interest groups or re-air 30 second commericals debating who has the most effective ad? Will anyone point out that both parties will more than likely decide their candidate from Iowa and New Hampshire that have no true demographic representation of our country??

There is a glimmer of hope and it was created by Vice President Dick Cheney.

By deciding not to run both parties will not have the advantage of an incumbent President or a Vice President that is shielded from the media. This is amazing coming from one of the most secretive Vice President's in the history of the oval office. Halliburton, Energy Task Force, were not transparent ventures but now he actually will give voters a chance to actually have a meaningful discussion on the issues facing the United States. The environment, immigration, national debt, etc.

My hope is that we actually might have a campaign that actually reaches the California primary for both parties!! Hey we might finally get a meaningful discussion about the candidates during the convention!!

Reality Meets Reality


This is an easy one to write about but it is a reflection of a society we live in today. This morning I was plodding through a few internet sites and found this story on Judge Judy posted on the Forbes website. Here is the story:

Since Judge Judy debuted in 1996, the irascible former family court judge continues to dominate the daytime reality courtroom genre, spawning countless copycats. (The genre was all but written off following the demise of The People's Court in 1993.) Her $100 million, four-year contract, signed in 2004, makes her one of the highest-paid women in television. She has been nominated eight times for an Emmy award and written four books, all of which became national bestsellers

Judge Judy makes more money than all of our Supreme Court Justices combined!! We could also make a statement that the President of the United States (who runs a 1.2 trillion dollar budget) has a salary per year that can not match Ashley and Mary Kate Olsen of television sitcom fame. Yes.. the President does have perks such as Air Force One, Camp David, Secret Service protection.

Yet one can easily see that we have a society that is more concerned about being entertained than actually creating a government that rewards competence. This is not a shock to anyone in society that actually follows the news. I just heard someone say something on the radio comparing American Idol ratings to that of President Bush's State of The Union Address. Here is a bigger question: Could we have more people voting on American Idol than in our election?. I know it is absurd to even bring up such a question but have we become a society that needs to be entertained in order to get involved in the act of voting??

Monday, January 01, 2007

Chico Bail Bonds Wins



My fantasy football has reached its ultimate destination, the Southern Lakes Fantasy Football Championship. This is due to the strong performance of a quarterback named Jon Kitna. It is amazing when you think about the fact that the second pick in my draft ever in the league was Joey Harrington!! Things have come full circle as my back up QB Kitna scores 30 points and four touchdowns to win 84-71. Over the weekend I plan to connect with Jon Kitna and write a nice letter thanking him for his efforts. Should he respond it will be posted on the Stew Report.

Great way to start 2007!!

Friday, December 29, 2006

The Worst Movies of 2006


The Worst Movies of 2006

Made $$$, Poor Film

"Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest”
Johnny Depp is a great actor but this film was too long and it made me think that Depp should have done this film immediately after the first one. The movie reviews of the first picture went to his head and the sequel’s script was not worthy of making another movie. When you make enough money from the first film to start your own country…. Disney probably thought who cares about a story lets make some money.

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan"
Teenagers across the country will flock to this movie.
It reminded me of the first episode of Studio 60 when the character of Wes Mendell goes on a rampage citing the problem with the media in America: “We're all being lobotomized by this country's most influential industry! It's just thrown in the towel on any endeavor to do anything that doesn't include the courting of twelve-year-old boys. Not even the smart twelve-year-olds - the stupid ones! The idiots - of which there are plenty, thanks in no small measure to this network! So why don't you just change the channel? Turn off the TV. Do it right now. Go ahead."


"The Da Vinci Code”
Another Wes Mendell rampage, “There's always been a struggle between art and commerce. But I'm telling you, right now art is getting its ass kicked, and it's making us mean and it's making us bitchy. It's making us cheap punks and that's not who we are!”

Here is my Simon Cowellesque American Idol perspective of this film (famous for his one liners after a performance): The Church itself is pretty upset about some of the ideas presented in the film, but they should have been upset about how idiotic it is.

Friday, November 24, 2006

A Digital Age Banana Republic in Florida??


Op-Ed Columnist
When Votes Disappear
By PAUL KRUGMAN

You know what really had me terrified on Nov. 7? The all-too-real possibility of a highly suspect result. What would we have done if the Republicans had held on to the House by a narrow margin, but circumstantial evidence strongly suggested that a combination of vote suppression and defective — or rigged — electronic voting machines made the difference?

Fortunately, it wasn’t a close election. But the fact that our electoral system worked well enough to register an overwhelming Democratic landslide doesn’t mean that things are O.K. There were many problems with voting in this election — and in at least one Congressional race, the evidence strongly suggests that paperless voting machines failed to count thousands of votes, and that the disappearance of these votes delivered the race to the wrong candidate.

Here’s the background: Florida’s 13th Congressional District is currently represented by Katherine Harris, who as Florida’s secretary of state during the 2000 recount famously acted as a partisan Republican rather than a fair referee. This year Ms. Harris didn’t run for re-election, making an unsuccessful bid for the Senate instead. But according to the official vote count, the Republicans held on to her seat, with Vern Buchanan, the G.O.P. candidate, narrowly defeating Christine Jennings, the Democrat.

The problem is that the official vote count isn’t credible. In much of the 13th District, the voting pattern looks normal. But in Sarasota County, which used touch-screen voting machines made by Election Systems and Software, almost 18,000 voters — nearly 15 percent of those who cast ballots using the machines — supposedly failed to vote for either candidate in the hotly contested Congressional race. That compares with undervote rates ranging from 2.2 to 5.3 percent in neighboring counties.

Reporting by The Herald-Tribune of Sarasota, which interviewed hundreds of voters who called the paper to report problems at the polls, strongly suggests that the huge apparent undervote was caused by bugs in the ES&S software.

About a third of those interviewed by the paper reported that they couldn’t even find the Congressional race on the screen. This could conceivably have been the result of bad ballot design, but many of them insisted that they looked hard for the race. Moreover, more than 60 percent of those interviewed by The Herald-Tribune reported that they did cast a vote in the Congressional race — but that this vote didn’t show up on the ballot summary page they were shown at the end of the voting process.

If there were bugs in the software, the odds are that they threw the election to the wrong candidate. An Orlando Sentinel examination of other votes cast by those who supposedly failed to cast a vote in the Congressional race shows that they strongly favored Democrats, and Mr. Buchanan won the official count by only 369 votes. The fact that Mr. Buchanan won a recount — that is, a recount of the votes the machines happened to record — means nothing.

Although state officials have certified Mr. Buchanan as the victor, they’ve promised an audit of the voting machines. But don’t get your hopes up: as in 2000, state election officials aren’t even trying to look impartial. To oversee the audit, the state has chosen as its “independent” expert Prof. Alec Yasinsac of Florida State University — a Republican partisan who made an appearance on the steps of the Florida Supreme Court during the 2000 recount battle wearing a “Bush Won” sign.

Ms. Jennings has now filed suit with the same court, demanding a new election. She deserves one.

But for the nation as a whole, the important thing isn’t who gets seated to represent Florida’s 13th District. It’s whether the voting disaster there leads to legislation requiring voter verification and a paper trail.

And I have to say that the omens aren’t good. I’ve been shocked at how little national attention the mess in Sarasota has received. Here we have as clear a demonstration as we’re ever likely to see that warnings from computer scientists about the dangers of paperless electronic voting are valid — and most Americans probably haven’t even heard about it.

As far as I can tell, the reason Florida-13 hasn’t become a major national story is that neither control of Congress nor control of the White House is on the line. But do we have to wait for a constitutional crisis to realize that we’re in danger of becoming a digital-age banana republic?

Saturday, November 18, 2006

FOX: OJ + Ratings = $$



What is my frustration at a certain network that claims to be "fair and balanced". My frustration lies at the hypocrisy of a news network/ along with a wave of conservative talk shows stating that the country is a wasteland of moral decay and at the same time promote the network that makes profits off these television shows that promote this moral decay.

Is there a better case study than Bill O'Reilly?

Bill O'Reilly threatened yesterday to whack Rupert Murdoch in the wallet for promoting O.J. Simpson's how-I-murdered-my-wife book.

Vowing to boycott any company that advertises on Fox's two-part special hyping O.J.'s "If I Did It," O'Reilly declared: "If every American walked away from the O.J. garbage, it wouldn't happen."

Bob Thompson, a Syracuse University professor and pop culture expert was quoted in the New York Daily News, he said he's not sure whether this whole controversy wasn't ginned up to produce ratings for Fox.

"My theory has always been that Fox News and Fox Broadcasting are the perfect synergy," he said. "One produces this outrageous programming that pundits on the other channel can complain about."

Really?????